Issue 2
Waste Management and Recycling
Index

1. Landfill of Waste

2. Biodegradable Waste

3. EU Legislation on Sewage Sludge

4. Packaging and Packaging Waste

5. Disposal of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Polychlorinated Terphenyls

6. Update on Batteries Legislation

7. References


1. Landfill of Waste (return to top of page)

Council Directive 99/31/EC - Official Journal L 182, 16.07.1999 - of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste is intended to prevent or reduce the adverse effects of the landfill of waste on the environment, in particular on surface water, groundwater, soil, air and human health.

It defines the different categories of waste (municipal waste, hazardous waste, non-hazardous waste and inert waste) and applies to all landfills, defined as waste disposal sites for the deposit of waste onto or into land. Landfills are divided into three classes: landfills for hazardous waste; landfills for non-hazardous waste;and landfills for inert waste.

In force: on 16 July 1999

Implementation Deadline: 16 July 2001

Objective of the Landfill Directive

  • To prevent or reduce as far as possible negative effects on the environment from the landfilling of waste, by introducing stringent technical requirements for waste and landfills.

Main Target

  • By 2020 at the latest, the amount of biodegradable municipal waste going to landfill must be reduced to 35% of the amount of such waste produced in 1995.

Key Provisions of the Landfill Directive

1. The Directive does not apply to:

  • the spreading on the soil of sludges (including sewage sludges and sludges resulting from dredging operations);
  • the use in landfills of inert waste for redevelopment or restoration work;
  • the deposit of unpolluted soil or of non-hazardous inert waste resulting from prospecting and extraction, treatment and storage of mineral resources as well as from the operation of quarries;
  • the deposit of non-hazardous dredging sludges alongside small waterways from which they have been dredged and of non-hazardous sludges in surface water, including the bed and its subsoil.

2. A standard waste acceptance procedure is laid down so as to avoid any risks:

  • waste must be treated before being landfilled;
  • hazardous waste within the meaning of the Directive must be assigned to a hazardous waste landfill;
  • landfills for non-hazardous waste must be used for municipal waste and for non-hazardous waste;
  • landfill sites for inert waste must be used only for inert waste.

3. The following wastes may not be accepted in a landfill:

  • liquid waste;
  • flammable waste;
  • explosive or oxidising waste;
  • hospital and other clinical waste which is infectious;
  • used tyres, with certain exceptions;
  • any other type of waste which does not meet the acceptance criteria laid down in Annex II.

4. The Directive set up a system of operating permits for landfill sites. Applications for permits must contain the following information:

  • the identity of the applicant and, in some cases, of the operator;
  • a description of the types and total quantity of waste to be deposited;
  • the capacity of the disposal site;
  • a description of the site;
  • the proposed methods for pollution prevention and abatement;
  • the proposed operation, monitoring and control plan;
  • the plan for closure and aftercare procedures;
  • the applicant's financial security;
  • an impact assessment study, where required under Council Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment.

5. Member States must ensure that existing landfill sites may not continue to operate unless they comply with the provisions of the Directive as soon as possible.

6. Member States must report to the Commission every three years on the implementation of the Directive.

7. On the basis of these reports the Commission must publish a Community report on the implementation of the Directive.

Overall effects of the Landfill Directive

  • increase disposal costs, and hence provide greater impetus to minimise, recycle and re-use waste
  • prohibit the long-established practice of co-disposing both solid and liquid hazardous wastes with non-hazardous wastes
  • require the development of additional treatment facilities
  • increase landfill gas utilisation, and so reduce global warming impacts.

Ancillary Legislation

A. Decision 2000/738/EC - Official Journal L 298, 25.11.2000
Commission Decision of 17 November 2000 concerning a questionnaire for Member States' reports on the implementation of Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste.

B. Proposal for a Decision on acceptance criteria COM(2002) 512
Implementation in the UK

The Landfill Directive will drastically change the way the UK handles waste. The directive was brought into force in the UK on June 15 2002 as the Landfill (England and Wales) Regulations 2002, and since then it has been introduced slowly to give UK industry time to adapt.

The first requirement of the regulations was for all landfill operators to submit a conditioning plan by July 16, 2002 which reclassified the site as inert, hazardous or non-hazardous. This is one of the key elements of the directive as previously, UK landfills had been either inert or practised co-disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous material. Now, 'non-hazardous' sites can accept only non-hazardous waste, while 'hazardous' sites can continue co-disposal until 2004, when co-disposal is finally banned.

The directive will also ban liquids and certain materials from landfill and tighten site monitoring and engineering standards. It will be supplemented by the new European Waste Catalogue, which has extended the range of materials classified as 'hazardous', and the Waste Acceptance Criteria, which will introduce stringent pre-treatment requirements.

Waste management in England and Wales 1998/99

 
Landfill
Recovery %
incl recycling/ composting
Recycling/
Composting
Industrial waste (excl construction and demolition waste)
47
45
39
Commercial waste
66
33
29
Municipal waste
83
17
9

Source: DEFRA 2000b

Compared to industrial and commercial waste, which together came to 71 million tonnes 2000/01, the municipal waste stream is relatively small. But as the above table shows, the municipal fraction is trailing behind in terms of recycling and recovery. In addition to this, about 60% of municipal household waste is biodegradable, and therefore a major contributor to the production of the greenhouse gas methane, when landfilled. For these reasons, the Landfill Directive focuses on reducing the impact of municipal waste.

UK Implementation targets

Because the UK is so dependent on landfill, it has been allowed an extra four years to meet European targets, leading to the following targets based on the weight of biodegradable municipal waste (BMW) landfilled in 1995:

  • Reduce BMW landfilled to 75% of 1995 level by 2010; reduce BMW landfilled to 50% of 1995 level by 2013; and reduce BMW landfilled to 35% of 1995 level by 2020

In addition, the government's Waste Strategy 2000, set the following timetable, focusing specifically on recycling and composting:

  • Increase recycling/composting of household waste to 25% by 2005; to 30% by 2010, and to 33% by 2015.
  • banning co-disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes, and requiring separate landfills for hazardous, non-hazardous and inert wastes.
  • banning landfilling of tyres (by 2003 for whole tyres, 2006 for shredded tyres).
  • banning landfilling of liquid wastes, infectious clinical waste and certain types of hazardous waste (e.g. explosive, highly flammable), all by 2001.
  • sets out provisions on the control, monitoring, reporting and closure of sites, which already form the backbone of waste management legislation in the UK.

The Landfill Directive requires substantial changes to the way waste is managed in the UK. As the Landfill Directive requires that, by 2020 at the latest, the amount of biodegradable municipal waste going to landfill be reduced to 35% of the amount of such waste produced in 1995, implementing the changes that will be required to meet them is a major challenge. The UK currently landfill around 23 million tonnes (85%) of municipal waste, and the amount of waste needing to be diverted away from landfill to meet these targets is substantial. This will require a step-change in how the Government deals with municipal waste in the future, and how it increases recycling, composting, and energy recovery.

The government hopes that recycling-focused legislation such as the Packaging Waste Directive 94/62/EC to achieve these goals, as will plans announced in 2002's Pre-Budget Report to increase the Landfill Tax by £3 per tonne per year from 2005/06. Then, the government hopes, composting, recycling and incineration will together eventually "crowd out" landfill.

Benefits of the Landfill Directive in the UK

  • Reduced risks of landfilling waste and promoting waste reduction, recycling and reuse.
  • Investment in treatment technologies, rising landfill standards and ongoing staff development could result in new opportunities across the semi-skilled, skilled and managerial employment range.
  • Utilisation of landfill gas. Landfill gas is a powerful contributor to global warming, as well as having local health and hazard impacts. Current regulations require control over its release, which is generally achieved by flaring.
  • The biogas industry estimates that despite measures to reduce the landfilling of biodegradable municipal waste, an additional 100 MWe of gas is exploitable. This may now be brought forward from 2002 under the requirements of the Directive. This would displace 350,000 tonnes per year of carbon dioxide from conventional electricity generation, saving between £0.3m and £7.9m per year in global warming impacts, and contributing to meeting the challenges of tackling climate change. In addition, utilisation in gas engines would save approximately 1000 tonnes per year of oxides of nitrogen otherwise emitted from flare stacks, saving of the order of £4.6m per year in damage cost (mainly health impacts) and contributing to targets under National Emission Ceilings Directive.

Total Compliance Cost of the Landfill Directive in the UK

The costs to waste producers of additional waste treatment arising from the requirements of the Directive are estimated at between £135m and £915m per year (Table 1).

The largest contribution to these costs derives from the 57 million tonnes per year of non-special solid waste.

Table 1: Assessment of annual additional cost of landfill disposal

 
Annual additional cost, £m
Mean additional treatment cost, £/t
 
Low
High
Low
High
Special Solid
27
91
15.40
52.60
Non-Special Solid
103
809
1.80
14.20
Special Solid
4
13
13.90
45.80
Non Special Liquid
0.5
2.2
2.40
9.90
Total
135
915

Source: DEFRA 2000a

In addition, preparation of conditioning plans will place a one-off cost of between £7m and £36m on the landfill industry, which largely will be passed back to waste producers through waste disposal charges.

Investment in additional gas utilisation is likely to be of the order of £75 to £100m over 8 years, but would be expected to break even over the project life through the sale of electricity.

In addition, disbenefits may also arise as a result of the impact of additional processing, recycling and transport of wastes, and from possible health impacts of workers that undertaken additional sorting. Different options for transposing the Directive will also impact costs.

(return to top of page)


2. Biodegradable Waste Policy

The management of specific waste streams represents an important element of the general EU Waste Management Strategy (COM(96) 399) by helping to reduce the impact of waste on the environment, by ensuring that waste is treated in an environmentally sound manner. Action on a specific waste stream is occasioned by its volume, its hazardousness, its treatment properties and its effects on the ecosystem.

So far, biodegradable waste has been regulated in order to reduce its negative consequences on the environment (Landfill Directive 99/31/EC). The Sewage Sludge Directive 86/278/EEC, the Organic Farming Regulation (EEC) No. 2092/91 and the eco-label for soil improvers and growing media (Commission Decision 2001/688/EC) are the EU instruments relevant to this waste stream.

Advantages of Biodegradable Waste

However, if properly regulated and managed, biodegradable waste may contribute towards effective resource management and sustainable development. In particular, biological treatment has the following advantages:

  • biological treatment contributes towards efforts to tackle the greenhouse effect, as it diverts biodegradable waste from landfilling, where it would produce methane, a powerful greenhouse gas;
  • the use of compost in agriculture is a way of maintaining or restoring the quality of soils because of the unique properties of the humified organic matter contained in the compost itself. It has a special relevance in certain southern regions of Europe, where it is a valuable method of tackling organic matter depletion, desertification and soil erosion, as well as in areas continuously used in arable production where organic matter levels are decreasing;
  • the use of compost in horticulture and in home gardening is a valid substitute for peat, thus reducing the rate of exploitation of wet lands;
  • anaerobic digestion is a means of producing ‘green energy’, with the possibility of obtaining a residue that, after an appropriate aerobic phase, can be used as a soil improver. For those biodegradable wastes that are suitable for anaerobic digestion, this biological treatment combines the advantages of composting with the production of energy.
The quantity of municipal solid waste (MSW) generated in the Community every year amounts to almost 200 million tonnes (Eurostat. Environment statistics, Pocketbook, Data 1980–1999. OPOCE. Luxembourg, 2001). Depending on local conditions, food and drink habits, climate, and degree of industrialisation, between 30% and 40% of MSW consists of food and garden waste, and another 20% to 30% consists of paper and cardboard waste. In total, between 60% and 70% of MSW can be considered as biodegradable waste (European Environment Agency (EEA). Environment in the European Union at the turn of the century. Environmental assessment report No. 2. 1999).

(return to top of page)


3. EU Waste legislation on Sewage Sludge

The Council Directive 86/278/EEC of 12 June 1986 (Official Journal L 181, 04.07.1986) on the protection of the environment, and in particular of the soil, when sewage is used in agriculture, regulates the use of sewage sludge in agriculture in such a way as to prevent harmful effects on soil, vegetation, animals and man.

Introduction

Sludge originates from the process of treatment of waste water. Due to the physical-chemical processes involved in the treatment, the sludge tends to concentrate heavy metals and poorly biodegradable trace organic compounds as well as potentially pathogenic organisms (viruses, bacteria etc) present in waste waters. Sludge is, however, rich in nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorous and contains valuable organic matter that is useful when soils are depleted or subject to erosion. The organic matter and nutrients are the two main elements that make the spreading of this kind of waste on land as a fertiliser or an organic soil improver suitable.

Sewage sludge has valuable agronomic properties in agriculture. In using the sludge account must be taken of the nutrient needs of plants, without however impairing the quality of the soil and of surface and ground water. Some heavy metals present in sewage sludge may be toxic to plants and man.

Objectives

  • To encourage the use of sewage sludge in agriculture and to regulate its use in such a way as to prevent harmful effects on soil, vegetation, animals and man.
  • To prohibit the use of untreated sludge on agricultural land unless it is injected or incorporated into the soil. Treated sludge is defined as having undergone "biological, chemical or heat treatment, long-term storage or any other appropriate process so as significantly to reduce its fermentability and the health hazards resulting from its use".
  • To prevent sludge from applying to soil in which fruit and vegetable crops are growing or grown, or less than ten months before fruit and vegetable crops are to be harvested, in order to provide protection against potential health risks from residual pathogens. To preventing grazing animals from being allowed access to grassland or forage land less than three weeks after the application of sludge.
  • To take account of the nutrient requirements of plants such that the quality of the soil and of the surface and groundwater is not impaired.

In force: since 18 June 1986

Implementation deadline in Member States: 18 June 1989

Key Provisions

  1. Sewage sludge may be used in agriculture, provided that the Member State concerned regulates its use.
  2. The Directive lays down limit values for concentrations of heavy metals in the soil (Annex IA), in sludge (Annex IB) and for the maximum annual quantities of heavy metals which may be introduced into the soil (Annex IC).
  3. The use of sewage sludge is prohibited if the concentration of one or more heavy metals in the soil exceeds the limit values laid down in accordance with Annex IA. The Member States must take the measures necessary to ensure that these limit values are not exceeded through the use of sludge.
  4. Sludge must be treated before being used in agriculture but the Member States may authorise the use of untreated sludge if it is injected or worked into the soil.
  5. The use of sludge is prohibited:
    • on grassland or forage crops if the grassland is to be grazed or the forage crops to be harvested before a certain period has elapsed (this period, fixed by the Member States, may not be less than three weeks);
    • soil in which fruit and vegetable crops are growing, with the exception of fruit trees;
    • ground intended for the cultivation of fruit and vegetable crops which are normally in direct contact with the soil and normally eaten raw, for a period of ten months preceding the harvest of the crops and during the harvest itself.
  6. Sludge and soil on which it is used must be sampled and analysed.
  7. The Member States must keep records registering the following:
    • the quantities of sludge produced and the quantities supplied for use in agriculture;
    • the composition and properties of the sludge;
    • the type of treatment carried out;
    • the names and addresses of the recipients of the sludge and the places where the sludge is to be used.
  8. Where conditions so demand, Member States may take more stringent measures than those provided for in this Directive.
  9. Five years after notification of this Directive, and every four years thereafter, Member States must prepare a consolidated report on the use of sludge in agriculture, specifying quantities used, criteria followed and any difficulties encountered; this report must be forwarded to the Commission.
  10. In the light of that report, the Commission will if necessary submit appropriate proposals for increased protection of the soil and the environment.

Relevant legislation and policy in relation to the Swage Sludge Directive

A. Directive 91/271/EEC on Urban Waste Water Treatment

The progressive implementation of the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive 91/271/EEC in all Member States is increasing the quantities of sewage sludge requiring disposal. From an annual production of some 5.5 million tonnes of dry matter in 1992, the Community is heading towards nearly 9 million tonnes by the end of 2005. This increase is mainly due to the practical implementation of the Directive as well as the slow but constant rise in the number of households connected to sewers and the increase in the level of treatment (up to tertiary treatment with removal of nutrients in some Member States). The Directive sets the following targets for secondary treatment of waste waters coming from agglomerations.

Targets of Urban Waste Treatment Directive

  • at the latest by 31 December 2000 for agglomerations of more than 15,000 p.e. (population equivalent);
  • at the latest by 31 December 2005 for agglomerations between 10,000 and 15,000 p.e.;
  • at the latest by 31 December 2005 for agglomerations of between 2,000 and 10,000 p.e. discharging to fresh waters and estuaries.

There are more stringent provisions for agglomerations discharging into sensitive areas such as fresh waters or estuaries.


B. Commission proposal on preventing soil degradation

On 19 April, the European Commission published a Communication entitled ‘Towards a Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection’. It is a first step in the development of a fully-fledged EU policy on soil protection.

Soil erosion, soil degradation and the sealing of soil are all growing problems in the EU. The 6th Environmental Action Programme proposes seven thematic strategies for environmental protection. One of these focuses on soil protection.

The Commission issued a Communication on a strategy for soil protection. It describes the problems facing soil use in the EU and it stresses the importance of taking action to improve the situation. It highlights legislative actions that will be taken in different areas, which will have beneficial effects on soil quality:

  • in 2002, the 4th daughter directive under the air quality framework will be proposed, relating to heavy metal and PAH;
  • in 2002, a directive on mining waste will be developed;
  • in 2003, there will be a revision of the sewage sludge directive;
  • by the end of 2004, a directive on bio waste will be proposed;
  • in 2003, there will be a communication on planning and the environment, concerning land-use planning.

The Communication also asks Member States together with the European Environmental Agency to set up monitoring systems to improve data on soil contamination. The aim is to increase the knowledge of the actual situation, and to enable best practice exchanges.

(return to top of page)


4. Packaging and Packaging Waste

In 1992, the Commission came forward with a Proposal for a Council Directive on Packaging and Packaging Waste. Following prolonged discussions, the EU Directive on Packaging and Packaging Waste was officially adopted by the European Parliament and the Council on 15th December 1994 and was published in Official Journal L365 on 31st December 1994 (Directive 94/62/EC).

The Directive lays down measures aimed at preventing the production of packaging waste in the first place but, once the packaging has been manufactured, it aims to increase the fundamental principles of reusing packaging where possible and recycling and other forms of recovering packaging waste.

In force: Since December 1994

Implementation in Member States: not later than 30th June 1996

Definition of Packaging and Packaging Waste

The Directive defines ‘Packaging’ within the meaning of Directive 94/62/EC as:

All products of any materials of any nature to be used for the containment, protection, handling, delivery and presentation of goods, from raw materials to processed goods, from the producer to the user or the consumer. Packaging therefore consists only of:

  • sales packaging or primary packaging
  • grouped packaging or secondary packaging (grouping of a certain number of sales units or used to replenish shelves at the point of sale- removed from product not affecting its characteristics)
  • transport packaging or tertiary packaging (facilitate handling and transport of a number of units or grouped packaging to prevent physical damage – does not include road, rail or ship containers)

Objectives of the Directive

  1. To harmonise national measures concerning the management of packaging and waste in order to prevent environmental impact of all member states and third countries or to reduce such impact thus providing a high level of environmental protection and to ensure the functioning of the internal market and to avoid obstacles to trade and distortion and restriction of competition within the Community.
  2. To set measures aimed at preventing the production of packaging waste and at encouraging the reuse of packaging, recycling and other forms of recovering waste to reduce the final disposal of such waste.

Targets

No later than 5 years from the date the directive is implemented into national law (by 31st July 2001) Member States should introduce systems for the return and/or collection of used packaging. The directive defined the following targets:

  1. Recovery of at least 50% and maximum 65% by weight of the packaging waste.
  2. Recycling of at least 25% and maximum 45% as a maximum by weight of the totality of packaging materials, with a material-specific minimum recycling rate of 15%.

Six months prior the end of the first 5-year phase the Council had to fix targets for the second five-year phase. This process was to be repeated every five years.

In addition, no later than 10 years from the date the Directive was implemented (by 31st July 2006) a percentage of packaging waste will be recovered and recycled.

 

  Present Directive – targets
by 30/06/01
07/12/01 Commission Proposal - targets
by 30/06/06
22/05/03 European Parliament, 2nd reading - targets
by 31/12/06
06/04/03 Council common position
- targets by 31/12/08
Recovery 50% - 65% 60% - 75% 60% + 60% +
Recycling 25% - 45% 55% - 70% 55% - 80 % 55% - 80 %
Recycling:
Glass
Paper/Board
Metals
Plastics
Wood

Min: 15%
Min: 15%
Min: 15%
Min: 15%
Min: 15%

Min: 60%
Min: 55%
Min: 55%
Min: 20%
No Target

Min: 60%
Min: 60%
Min: 50%
Min: 22.5%
Min: 15%

Min: 60%
Min: 60%
Min: 50%
Min: 22.5%
Min: 15%

Source: EUROPEN, April 2002 [updated by EurActiv 17 March 2003]

UK position

The UK narrowly failed to meet the 2001 recovery target of at least 50% but did meet the recycling target and material-specific recycling targets for all materials including plastic. The UK achieved 48% recovery with a shortfall against the 50% target of just 195,000 tonnes.

  Recycling by Material:    
  Paper   Steel /Alu. Plastic Overall Recycling Overall Recovery
Directive Targets for 2001 15% 15% 15% 15%    
Achieved by the UK in 2001 52% 33% 37/24% 16% 42% 48%

Source: www.defra.gov.uk/environment/waste/topics/packaging/faq.htm

On 20 November 2003, Elliot Morley, Minister for Environment and Agri-Environment, announced new Government recovery and recycling targets.

The Government intends to increase the business targets for packaging waste from the present 59% recovery and 19% material-specific recycling as follows:

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Paper

65

66

68

69

70

Glass

49

55

61

66

71

Aluminium

26

28

30.5

33

35.5

Steel

52.5

55

58

60

61.5

Plastic

21.5

22

22.5

23

23.5

Wood

18

19

20

20.5

21

Overall recovery

63

65

67

69

70

Minimum amount of recovery to be achieved through recycling

94%

94%

94%

95%

95%

Source: http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2003/031120a.htm

Cost to UK Producers

Current estimates of the additional cost of meeting the European Commission's proposed recovery and recycling targets for packaging waste (with a 2006 deadline) are £458 million to £656 million over five years.

It is also estimated that an extension of the deadline from 2006 to 2007 would save obligated business in the UK between £28 million and £36 million. An extension to 2008 would save between £68 million and £84 million.

In addition, economists estimate that if the targets were to increase beyond those proposed by the European Commission, as has been proposed by the European Parliament, each one percentage point increase would cost UK businesses approximately an additional £53 million.

UK Government View

The UK strongly supports the structure and scope of the Common Position reached in October 2002. Given the two-year delay in agreeing new targets and the step change in recycling suggested, the UK strongly holds to the Council’s proposal for 2008 deadline. This position is supported by British businesses, the major compliance schemes and the Government’s independent Advisory Committee on Packaging. Significantly higher recycling targets and a timeframe less than 2008 could cause difficulties to the UK.

The Government supports the setting of more challenging targets (60% recovery and 55% recycling) but these must be realistic and achievable. In fact, in order to meet higher targets, additional infrastructure to collect household packaging waste will have to be put in place. In addition to the lead times necessary to achieve this, it is important to allow time for the new infrastructure to come on stream and enable the collection of significantly more quantities of packaging from the Household waste stream, which is ultimately an essential step to meeting higher targets. The shorter the deadline, the higher the costs to industry would be to achieve the agreed results. The UK Government has had difficulty in identifying any significant benefits that would accrue from earlier deadlines.

Implementation in the UK

The Packaging Directive has been transposed into UK law through the 1999 Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations 1997 on which DEFRA had the lead and through the 2003 Packaging (Essential Requirements) Regulations 1998, on which DTI had the lead. The UK and France are the only two Member States to actively enforce the Essential Packaging Requirements in domestic law.
The current UK system for meeting the Directive’s obligations works by requiring companies with a £2 million (and above) turnover and of handling more than 50 tonnes of packaging a year to pay for a certain proportion of the UK obligations to recycle packaging. Importers of pre-packaged goods pay for 100% of the obligation.

Companies usually fulfil their obligation by buying Packaging Waste Recovery Notes (PRNs). PRNs are issued by reprocesses/recyclers accredited by the Environment Agency. PRNs have a market value which accords to the amount of demand for the notes that relate to the amount in supply, the UK targets for that year, and the amount companies or compliance schemes have already bought. PRN prices are at an all time low due to excess supply. Nevertheless, they are expected to rise substantially over the next 5 years. PERNS are also issued for the export of packaging waste to approved reprocessors overseas.

History of the Directive

The Community first introduced measures on the management of packaging waste in the early 1980s. Directive 85/339/EEC of 27 June 1985 covered the packaging of liquid beverage containers but it was too vague to bring about the effective harmonization of national policies and was repealed by Directive 94/62/EC on 31st December 1994.

Only some EU Member States introduced measures on packaging and packaging waste management with a view to reducing their environmental impacts. Serious Internal Market problems arose when cheap secondary materials from countries with recycling schemes, which provided funding for collection and recycling, appeared on the markets of other Member States where no such schemes were in place. Collection and recycling activities that relied on cost recovery through the sale of secondary raw material were threatened by collapse. For this reason, economic operators and Member States approached the Commission to introduce comprehensive legislation on packaging.

Revision of 94/62/EC Directive

The 94/62/EC Directive is currently being revised.

On 7 December 2001 the Commission presented a proposal for an amendment to the directive. The new proposal (COM (2001)729 final) details more ambitious targets for recovery and recycling to be met by 30 June 2006:

  1. Overall recovery and recycling targets must be between 60% and 75%, and 55% and 70% respectively.
  2. Target rates for specific materials are also set: 60% for glass, 55% for paper and cardboard, 50% for metals and 20% for plastics (mechanical and chemical recycling only).
  3. Greece, Ireland and Portugal are given until 30 June 2009 to meet these targets.
  4. No proposal has been made for revising the other aspects of the Directive, such as prevention, reuse or producer responsibility

The vote (2 July 2003) failed to obtain the 314 votes necessary to pass amendments bringing forward the new deadline and targets for recycling and recovery of packaging waste in the EU. This confirmed the deadline and targets as those set out in the Common Position as 60% recovery and 55% recycling of packaging waste by 31 December 2008.

The Commission intends to publish shortly a proposal for a second phase of the review. This will take into account wider issues such as prevention of waste packaging, reuse of packaging and the introduction of a specific reference to producer responsibility as well as any changes to the essential requirements in Annex II of the Directive. The second phase of the revision could take between 1 and 3 years.

Ancillary EU legislation on packaging and packaging waste

  • Commission Decision 1999/42/EC of 22 December 1998 confirming the measures notified by Austria pursuant to Article 6(6) of Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (notified under document number C(1998) 3940)
  • Commission Decision 1999/177/EC of 8 February 1999 establishing the conditions for a derogation for plastic crates and plastic pallets in relation to the heavy metal concentration levels established in Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste (notified under document number C(1999) 246)
  • Commission Decision 1999/652/EC of 15 September 1999 confirming the measures notified by Belgium pursuant to Article 6(6) of Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on packaging and packaging waste (notified under document number C(1999) 2919) (Text with EEA relevance)
  • Commission Decision 1999/823/EC of 22 November 1999 confirming the measures notified by the Netherlands pursuant to Article 6(6) of Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (notified under document number C(1999) 3818)

(return to top of page)


5. Disposal of Polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated terphenyls (PCB’s/PCT’s)

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) are among a group of man-made chemicals that are known as Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs). PCBs were commercially produced world-wide on a large scale from the 1930s to 1980s. Given their extraordinary chemical stability and heat resistance, they were extensively employed as components in electrical and hydraulic equipment and lubricants.

They have been used in two types of applications:

  1. Closed uses: dielectric fluids in electrical equipment such as transformers, capacitors (big industrial capacitors, but also small capacitors in household electrical appliances), heat transfer and hydraulic systems.
  2. Open uses: as pesticide extenders, sealant, carbonless copy paper, industrial oils, paints, adhesives, plastics, flame retardants and to control dust on roads.
In the 1970s, owing to severe concerns pertaining to their human toxicity, suspected carcinogenicity, and environmental persistence, several countries limited the use of PCBs. Finally in 1985, the use and marketing of PCBs in the European Community were very heavily restricted.

The EU Directive on the Disposal of Polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated terphenyls (PCB’s/PCT’s) was officially adopted by the European Parliament and the Council on 16th September 1996 and was published in Official Journal L243 on 24th September 1996 (Directive 96/59/EC) The Directive aims to approximate the laws of the Member States on the controlled disposal of PCBs, the decontamination or disposal of equipment containing PCBs and/or the disposal of used PCBs in order to eliminate them completely.

In force: Since September 1996

Implementation in Member States: not later than 16 March 1998

Definition of Polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated terphenyls

The Directive defines ‘PCB’s’ within the meaning of Directive 96/59/EC as:

    • polychlorinated biphenyls
    • polychlorinated terphenyls
    • Monomethyl-tetrachlorodiphenyl methane, Monomethyl-dichloro-diphenyl methane,
    • Monomethyl-dibromo-diphenyl methane
    • Any mixture containing any of the abovementioned substances in a total of more than 0.00% by weight

Objectives of the Directive

  1. Member States must take the necessary measures to ensure that:
    • used PCBs are disposed of;
    • PCBs and equipment containing PCBs are decontaminated or disposed of.
  2. Inventories must be compiled of equipment with PCB volumes of more than 5 dm3, which Member States must send to the Commission by September 1999 at the latest. The equipment and PCBs contained in the inventories must be decontaminated or disposed of by 2010 at the latest.
    The inventories must supply the following data:
    • the names and addresses of the holders;
    • the location and description of the equipment;
    • the quantity of PCBs contained in the equipment;
    • the date and type of treatment planned;
    • the date of the declaration.
    Any equipment which is subject to inventory must be labelled.
  3. Member States must prohibit:
    • the separation of PCBs from other substances for the purpose of reusing the PCBs;
    • the topping-up of transformers with PCBs.
  4. Member States must take the necessary measures to ensure that:
    • PCBs, used PCBs and equipment containing PCBs which is subject to inventory are transferred to licensed undertakings, at the same time ensuring that all necessary precautions are taken to avoid the risk of fire;
    • any incineration of PCBs or used PCBs on ships is prohibited;
    • all undertakings engaged in the decontamination and/or the disposal of PCBs, used PCBs and/or equipment containing PCBs obtain permits;
    • transformers containing more than 0.05% by weight of PCBs are decontaminated under the conditions specified by the Directive.
  5. In accordance with the committee procedure referred to in Directive 75/442/EEC, the Commission:
    • must fix the reference methods of measurement to determine the PCB content of contaminated materials;
    • may fix technical standards for the other methods of disposing of PCBs;
    • must make available a list of the production names of capacitors, resistors and induction coils containing PCBs;
    • will determine, if necessary, other less hazardous substitutes for PCBs.
  6. Within three years following the adoption of this Directive, Member States must draw up:
    • plans for the decontamination and/or disposal of inventoried equipment and the PCBs contained therein;
    • plans for the collection and subsequent disposal of equipment not subject to inventory.
  7. This Directive repeals Directive 76/403/EEC.

Targets

Directive 96/59/EC on the disposal of PCBs and PCTs aims to completely dispose of PCBs and equipment containing PCBs as soon as possible, and for big equipment before the end of 2010. This Directive sets the requirements for an environmentally sound disposal of PCBs.

Member States must create an inventory of big equipment containing PCBs, adopt a plan for disposal of inventoried equipment, and draw up outlines for collection and disposal of non inventoried equipment (small electrical equipment very often present in household appliances manufactured before the ban on marketing of PCBs).

The Commission has also adopted a Community Strategy on PCBs aimed at reducing their release into the environment and introduction in to food chains.

UK Position

It was estimated that in 1999 a maximum of 8,000 tonnes of PCBs remain in the UK for disposal. This estimate has been made by deducting the amount of known disposals and exports from the amount of PCBs known to have been produced or imported. The actual figure may well be less. The most likely sources of PCB wastes are items of electrical equipment (transformers and capacitors), which may be bulky items to handle. It is estimated that a significant proportion of UK PCBs is held in some 1,800 transformers and 450,000 capacitors.

The UK Government intends to deal with identifiable PCBs and related substances by applying a set of bans:

  • the current ban on the supply by way of sale and use of PCBs in new plant and equipment will be immediately extended to cover:
    • all monochlorinated and dichlorinated biphenyls - these cannot effectively be separated from PCBs (described below as APCBs equivalents);
    • all mixtures and wastes containing more than 50ppm by weight of PCBs equivalents;
    • any object, eg redundant transformer tank and its internal windings, that is so contaminated with PCB equivalents that physical or chemical interaction with another object would produce contamination above the 50 ppm by weight level.
  • a ban on the use or storage (whether in equipment either in use or held in reserve or otherwise) of PCBs, PCB equivalents and PCNs from 16 March 1998 except where the equipment containing the substances has been registered with a competent authority. On registration of equipment a target date shall be set for its destruction.
  • a ban on supply by way of sale, use and storage of PCBs, PCB equivalents and PCNs from 31 December 1999 (but see paragraph 27 and 28 on limited derogations from the ban); it would become an offence to keep or hold any PCBs (beyond the proposed de minimis exemption) after that date (http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/marine/pcb/action.htm)
On 4th May 2000 the Environmental Protection (Disposal of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and other Dangerous Substances) (England and Wales) Regulations 2000 came into force in England and Wales.

It stated that no person shall, after 31 December 2000, hold:

  • any PCBs, including any used PCBs; or
  • any equipment (whether or not that equipment is contaminated equipment) (i) which contains PCBs, or (ii) which, having contained PCBs, has not been decontaminated.

History of the Directive

In 1990, at the Third International North Sea Conference, the UK and other North Sea states agreed to phase out and destroy identifiable Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by the end of 1999. Following this, the Paris Commission, which is responsible for measures to tackle land based sources of pollution of the North East Atlantic, agreed a Decision on PCBs in 1992. This confirmed the end of 1999 as the date for phase-out by North Sea countries and set a target date of 2010 for those non-North Sea countries which were party to the Paris Convention.

(return to top of page)


6. Update on Batteries Legislation

On 25 November 2003, the European Commission adopted a Proposal for a new Battery Directive (COM(2003) 723 final).

Directive 91/157/EEC had limited scope as it only covered certain batteries – only 7% of all portable batteries placed on the EU market annually. It did not set collection targets and failed to adequately control the risks posed by batteries in the waste stream. Therefore, many batteries still ended up in the waste stream – in 2002, 45% of portable batteries sold in the CU went to landfill or incineration.

The new Directive applies to all batteries and accumulators placed on the market. It establishes a closed-loop system so member states have to avoid final disposal and achieve high levels of collection and recycling.

  • restricts the use of mercury in batteries
  • ban on landfill/incineration for automotive and industrial batteries
  • member states must promote research on and the marketing of batteries with less polluting substances
  • member states must monitor the quantities of portable nickel-cadmium (NiCd) batteries discarded in the waste steam
  • Every 3 years the Commission will evaluate the need to take further measures

Collection:

  • consumers can bring batteries to collection points free of charge
  • producers must take back industrial batteries from end-users
  • producers of automotive batteries should set up collection schemes for automotive batteries not collected under ELV

Targets:

  • authorities must ensure that all collected batteries enter a recycling process and different rates then apply:
    • 65% by weight for lead acid batteries with all lead recycled
    • 75% be weight for NiCads with all cadmium recycled
    • 55% for all others
  • overall collection target for spent portable NiCd batteries of 160grams per inhabitant (about 40% of annual sales)
  • additional collection target for spent portable NiCd batteries of 80% of those generated annually.

Recycling: Under closed loop in principle all batteries collected separately should be recycled so target are 100% but allow a maximum of 10% to be exempt (batteries not in a condition to be recycled)

Resource savings generated through recycling:

Manganese: 20,000 tonnes/yr
Zinc: 20,000 tonnes/yr
Iron: 15,000 tonnes/yr
Lead: 7,500 tonnes/yr
Nickel: 2,000 tonnes/yr
Cadmium: 1,500 tonnes/yr
Mercury: 28 tonnes/yr

Financing: In line with the producer responsibility principle, the producers should finance the collection and treatment requirements. Member states keep a national register of all battery producers and importers and each producer must guarantee that management of spent batteries will be financed.

Targets become legally binding 4 years after the date of transposition (the days of entry into the Official Journal plus 18months).

There are 6 EU countries already running collection schemes and 4 have already met the target of 160grams. Belgium already collects 230g – the UK collects only 2g.

Producers dispute the draft legislation, wanting a target of 110g (not 160g). They also dispute the 55% recycling rate for portable batteries as industry says this will fail because it can’t be measured that accurately.

(return to top of page)


5. References

DEFRA (2000a) The Implementation of Council Directive 1999/31/EC on the Landfill of Waste, DEFRA, London.

DEFRA (2000b) Waste Strategy 2000 for England and Wales, DEFRA, London.

Web sites:

www.letsrecycle.com
www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/waste/waste_topics.htm
www.environment-agency.gov.uk
www.euractiv.com
www.endsreport.com
www.dti.gov.uk/sustainability
www.defra.gov.uk/environment/
www.recycle-more.co.uk

(return to top of page)